If logic really led to a Creator then why is Christian dogma so illogical and absurd? Instead of actually using logic to make his argument, Steve vilifies unbelief as if not being able to buy into a belief system that involves absurd invisible beings such as angels, demons, seraphs, Satan and so on is somehow morally wrong. Instead Steve justifies his and his religion's inability to prove its ridiculous claims by espousing the supposed "virtue of faith" as if the acceptance of unproven hypotheses and ancient religious dogma is somehow a sign of superior morals and ethics. If that were true we should see this reflected in superior morals and ethics of believers over non-Christians. But we don't and quite often the opposite is the case. Steve also displays a profound ignorance of what atheism is with his absurd claim that people can actually rebel against a magical Being they don't believe even exists. Why do you Christians rebel against Allah? See what I mean. You can't rebel against a God you don't believe exists.